I spend a great deal of time reflecting spiritually, emotionally & intellectually on the role I play as academic facilitator/mentor. So in my time this weekend of conducting my reflective disciplines. I realized that maybe I could have spent more time explaining biological versus social-cultural construction of the term "Race".
Darlene's question was an excellent one, "If race is not biological, why are a male and female European-American couple highly likely to have a child who is fair-skinned?" Regionally & historically we know different regions, morph from darker to lighter skin shades- nevertheless melanin is a gene that exist differently in everyone. It dictates the color of your skin, so melanin is a biological gene. Its one gene in a slew of DNA strands that we all share- over 90% of DNA that we have is common in all humans.
This is important to understand because although melanin construction is a gene that is biological, the construction of the term "Race" was not derived from that knowledge. It was derived from the false notion that because skin color was different, it meant inferiority in all areas of human capacity: potential.
I say all of this to address that historically so-called considerable biological differences between races, was a false construction, that was and is really based on a maintenance and justification of power, not in the difference in a melanin gene.
So thank you for asking wonderful questions that provoke me to further facilitate learning, in ways that clarify, create opportunists to dialogue and most importantly allow for change & growth.
The truth is that there is nothing noble in being superior to somebody else. The only real nobility is in being superior to your former self.
Joy,
Mayra Lopez,LMSW
Assistant Professor, Department of Social Work
Nyack College
845-358-1710/ext. 733
mayra.humphreys@nyack.edu